Xbitlabs have thrown up their Quadro FX 3000 in 3ds max 5 review, where they compare the latest professional graphics card from Nvidia in the shape of the Quadro FX 3000 against the Quadro FX 2000 (based on GeForce 5800 Ultra), FireGL X1 (based on RADEON 9700 PRO) and a GeForce FX 5900 Ultra based gaming card. Here's a snip:
July 22, 2003, NVIDIA announced its new ?professional? graphics card ? Quadro FX 3000 based on the GeForce FX 5900 Ultra GPU. There was the usual blowing-out of cheeks and words like ?uncompromising?, ?universal for pro applications? and even ?unique? (although this same product costing thousand dollars differs from its game mate in the drivers only). We are most interested in two things, though: speed and quality. The image quality depends on the drivers and they haven?t changed since Quadro FX 2000. You can view the screenshots here. This review is dedicated to speed characteristics of the new card.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000 in 3DS Max 5
July 22, 2003, NVIDIA announced its new ?professional? graphics card ? Quadro FX 3000 based on the GeForce FX 5900 Ultra GPU. There was the usual blowing-out of cheeks and words like ?uncompromising?, ?universal for pro applications? and even ?unique? (although this same product costing thousand dollars differs from its game mate in the drivers only). We are most interested in two things, though: speed and quality. The image quality depends on the drivers and they haven?t changed since Quadro FX 2000. You can view the screenshots here. This review is dedicated to speed characteristics of the new card.
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000 in 3DS Max 5
