#4939

Tuckwit

2003-02-14 14:14

But won't do 5h1t for games!

0 0

#4940

digitalwanderer

2003-02-14 14:39

So? These are optimized for that "useless and un-realistic" benchmark that nVidiwho doesn't focus on..... :hmm:

0 0

#4941

smjames23

2003-02-14 15:08

ti4200 from 1132 to 1270 :) looks like in helps the shaders. remember 3dmark03 is all about the shaders. :) made america's army about 6fps faster too

0 0

#4942

digitalwanderer

2003-02-14 16:02

Yup, I went from 1069 to 1155; but got some bigtime black squares/black banding. :rolleyes: It was most noticeable in the scenes where the chick was fighting the trolls, it covered almost 1/3 of the screen. Also, no explosions in the airplane collision in the first test.

0 0

#4943

pitr-

2003-02-14 17:05

30.82 - 1793 3DMarks 42.86 - 1990 3DMarks +197 can't complain

0 0

#4944

Tuckwit

2003-02-14 17:54

Yep, NVidia say we don't like 3dmark03, it's not fair, but lets frig our drivers so that it gets closer to the ATI even at the expense of graphical problems (see below)

0 0

#4945

Jaybo

2003-02-14 19:37

Kinda weird how the new Catalyst drivers also just came out... isn't it...?

0 0

#4946

Jaybo

2003-02-14 21:24

Kinda weird how the new Catalyst drivers also just came out... isn't it...?

0 0

#4947

rtz

2003-02-15 00:45

I've been running 42.86's for weeks now and they release some "old" 42.68's? Leak some new drivers! :)

0 0