Mozilla Firefox 1.5.0.4
MB
They forgot to mention this time that this patch also gives a nice boost to fanboy egos, as every patch!
TSThomas
Yes, 9 more critical vulnerabilities to the Patched list. How terrible of them to fix vulnerabilities & other bugs. Shame on them!
Mastertech
I like these baseless comments. Please provide documented reproduceable proof it is faster.
Mastertech
Disinformation means spreading information that is false. I actually inform people with factual information that is true. The truth hurts.
Mastertech
Mozilla hasn't patched vulnerabilities from 2004. Yes please show me a link that Auto-installs spyware. I am still waiting with bated breath. I have been waiting for two years for proof that my fully patched IE install can auto-install Spyware. You have yet to deliver. Could this be the FUD you were talking about?
Mastertech
I am not interested in some video of an already patched vulnerability. I want a link where I can reproduce Spyware Auto-installing now, today. I realize this is very difficult for you to comprehend since your goal is to spread FUD about Zero Day exploits and non existent prexposure. Anything to basely bash IE.
Mastertech
I have a firm agenda to let the public know the truth about Firefox. Your consistent baseless personal attacks against your "perceived" intentions of mine only furthers your ignorance. Why not go back to correcting all the factual errors in your guides with the information from my research. Starting with Windows Prefetching. You can then come back and learn the truth about Firefox.
Mastertech
Perhaps TSSpammer would like to figure out where I make any comment of auto-installing Spyware in Firefox. Oh wait? Is this another of your fabricated self-induced arguments? You learn well from the master of mind reading = Mr. Hammond. The Sunbelt Link is used as proof of SPYWARE infection in Firefox, it has nothing to do with IE.
Mastertech
There is no selective presentation of information. All the information is linked directly to the source. There is absolutely NOTHING to hide. I even stress that everyone read the direct sources themselves. What I am doing is putting a stop once and for all to all the Hype, Misinformation and Myths that have been spread about what would in any other circumstances be an average web browser. But with the ability of Mozilla to mislead everyone with the SpreadFirefox Propaganda it is now what appears to have been their intent all along, a Cash Cow. Mozilla is now raking in tens of millions of dollars off all the suckers who fell for the BS. "The Mozilla Corporation pays its employees from the revenues we receive from our product. We are very fortunate in that the search feature in Firefox is both appreciated by our users and generates revenue in the tens of millions of dollars." If you mean how every Firefox Fanboy has tried to correct me. Then you are right, I did not know their were this many brain washed followers of the Firefox Religion.
Mastertech
I just realized why you consistently personally attack me. Apparently having to go back and consistently correct the unresearched untested misinformation in your "tweak" guides with research off my page must be a big embarrassment to you. All this time slowing people's systems down with your misinformed prefetching advice. Even AFTER I provided you with the information. I can understand that you had doubts about being wrong so much but what can I say? You are. Here is embarrassing quote #1 off your forums: I think I misspoke; turning Prefetcher back on is what resolved my bootup issues. Following your method is what inflated my bootup times. You have dug yourself such a big hole here with your absolute lack of knowledge on how theWindows Prefetched works you now don't care that you are slowing people's systems down. I can see how this anger may make you want to lash out at me for constantly correcting you.
Mastertech
I find it hillarious how all the Fanboys are hung up on the Fanboy Quotes and then try to claim they have any relation to the factual information presented on the page. If telling the truth about something discredits it then it makes you wonder what substance the product really has. I repeat there is not one lie on the page and no disinformation, only facts and sources.
TSThomas
The Sunbelt link on Firefox Myths relates to a vulnerability patched in Firefox 1.0.5 about 11 months ago. Yet Sunbelts video for IE auto-installation (About 2 months old at that) is now met with "I am not interested in some video of an already patched vulnerability". So by your own logic that indicates you are using a link for the purpose of "Anything to basely bash Firefox".
Mastertech
The Sunbelt link is to prove that Spyware can infect Firefox. It is not some comparison to IE, though you wish to make it one. The Sunbelt link for IE proves what we already know, spyware can infect IE. However that is irrelevant and old news. What I want is proof that my fully patched IE can be infected with auto-installing spyware. These are vastly different things.
Mastertech
No I want a link that I can test today on my fully patched version of IE. You keep spreading FUD about Zero day exploits and how patch time with IE is just going to blow up the planet, yet you can not provide any evidence. You show me videos or links to patched exploits and then try to complain because I use links to show Firefox can get infected with Spyware. Which has nothing to do with your Zero Day hoopla and IE. These are two completely different points that you have merged by changing the wording of what I am saying. Get a clue. Your desperation gets worse everyday. I am still waiting on the link that I can reproduce auto-installing spyware on my fully patched version of IE.
TSThomas
You've repeatedly asked for proof of auto-installing spyware in IE, now you've been given it. As you've said in response here "The Sunbelt link for IE proves what we already know". Congratulations, you've finally admitted auto-installation of malware in IE.
TSThomas
The evidence has been provided, it is you who chooses to deny it. Unlike the "fanboys" here who make no such claims about Firefox. You provide a year old link to a patched Firefox exploit (Which if I recall, was patched before exploits were "in the wild"), whereas the link I've provided is for a 2 month old IE vulnerability which *was* exploited in the wild before a patch was released. But, not to worry, as you've said here "The Sunbelt link for IE proves what we already know". Well done on the honesty.
Mastertech
You have a serious comprehension problem. The Sunbelt link demonstrates spyware infecting IE with an exploit that is patched. No kidding. TSSpammer you need to go ram your head into the wall. We already know an unpatched version fo IE can get infected with Spyware. What I want is simple a link that can infect my fully patched IE version. You don't have it, you have nothing.
Mastertech
You have twisted everything so far now I think you are believing your own fabrications. I have always asked for a link that will infect my fully patched version of IE. That is FULLY PATCHED. Do you get it yet? FULLY PATCHED!! You have nothing but FUD. You want to present this Zero Day exploit hysteria that doesn't exist. I have been waiting for ANYONE to send me a link to auto-installing spyware on my fully patched version of IE. That I can test AND confirm. You have nothing. Go peddle your fear to the ignorant.
TSThomas
TSThomas
You say it yourself on Firefox Myths; "Anyone who claims Internet Explorer cannot be secured from Auto-installing Spyware either doesn't know how or is lying." What were users of fully patched systems infected by zero-day, unpatched, vulnerabilities earlier this year? From what you say on Firefox Myths this is impossible to happen.
