GeForce 3 Outperforms a Radeon 9800 Pro
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a618/0a618a788d22fd4f3a46e4b52266c3f44ee6455b" alt="data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp"
AC
I agree, the ATI and some other manus have problems with that BattleField 1941. The card he used was a 9800 Pro as mentioned above. Its possible that the settings he used worked better with a GF3 than a 9800 Pro. Its expected, most new gfx cards perform poorly with older games and lower resolutions. High performance games = high performance settings! No proof at all, its just his word over your own! News for yah :/
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6d3d/b6d3d24554b395544749ce41ce4661dbc4a232db" alt="data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp"
Trik
That developers and manufactures still can't make *Stupid Proof* devices and/or systems.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a618/0a618a788d22fd4f3a46e4b52266c3f44ee6455b" alt="data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp"
NIKEMARINE
Lets put it this way its been proven, that ATI cards are more CPU dependant that the TI series....