Firefox versus Internet Explorer in a Corporate Network
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6d3d/b6d3d24554b395544749ce41ce4661dbc4a232db" alt="data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp"
TSThomas
Pretty spot on article alright. Not too sure on the whole patching Firefox situation though. I was under the impression it (Firefox 1.5) would auto-update just fine unless they'd got limited permissions for the installation directory (Works just fine when I installed it at work anyway).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36f35/36f35bed3202ac5b895192255f2c5c04f2560771" alt="data/avatar/default/avatar03.webp"
AJCrowley
Yeah, I love to have a corporate network congested by spyware and viruses. I'm forced to disagree, to the point of calling the author on knowing not of what he speaks.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6d3d/b6d3d24554b395544749ce41ce4661dbc4a232db" alt="data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp"
TSThomas
It's not a matter of what the better browser is, it's a matter of what the most manageable is, & Internet Explorer is the most manageable undoubtedly. I don't think Opera fares much differently in this regard either. I seem to recall reading somewhere corporate installation was something they were working on for Firefox 2 though (?).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6d3d/b6d3d24554b395544749ce41ce4661dbc4a232db" alt="data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp"
TSThomas
my bad, forgot the title to that link; The unpatched CreateTextRange vulnerability in Internet Explorer is already being used by at least one Web site to install spyware on users' machines, a security organization said Friday. "We just received a report that a particular site uses the vulnerability to install a spybot variant," the SANS Institute's Internet Storm Center (ISC) warned Friday in an alert... "It's a relatively trivial mod[ification] to turn [the exploit] into something more destructive," the ISC warned.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6d3d/b6d3d24554b395544749ce41ce4661dbc4a232db" alt="data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp"
Mastertech
Why are you trying to cover up a vulnerability in Linux? To make it not look so bad? I think it is important information people know that the only extremely critical vulnerability in Firefox is found in the fanboys beloved Linux.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6d3d/b6d3d24554b395544749ce41ce4661dbc4a232db" alt="data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp"
TSThomas
"All Myths relate to running the default install of Firefox in Windows with no extensions." By your own admission the vulnerability doesn't count as it does apply to windoiws