TsThomas, you are a genius. The page doesn't even mention Opera as the most secure browser. It helps to read. Nanobox doesn't have a clue what he is talking about and every single point he has tried to make has been refuted many times. As for you stats it helps to read there as well. "But XiTi's figures should probably be taken with a grain of salt, as Firefox usage tends to be highest over the weekend, according to Tristan Nitot, the president of Mozilla Europe."

I meant standards compliant, heh.

The ActiveX remark is another Myth. Not to mention SP2 takes care of any remote chance of this.

myth 102- If you waste your time posting comments on this topic you aren't a pos faggot.....lol...

From ArsTechnica: "As good as those numbers are, they need to be taken with a grain of salt. XiTi performed its measurements on a weekend, which means it captured a disproportionate number of home users and comparatively few corporate desktops. Most large companies still use Internet Explorer, so using weekend surfing activities as a baseline for market share evaluations is going to miss out on a lot of IE use." XiTi is severly manipulating data to make FF look much better than it is. 1. Nanobox is being used to dispute the Myth that FF is fully W3C Compliant. 2. Try Reading Lynx is NOT a graphical web browser. 3. More Secure means just that "More" Secure than. It does NOT mean Secure as in "100% Secure". Nothing will be reworded as it already is very clear. Nanobot's Data and his opinions are two VERY different things.

"XiTi is severly manipulating data to make FF look much better than it is." Again, I've already stated in my original post those stats relate to the weekends, the point of my post was, you can find site stats to support a very low, or very high use for a browser. "1. Nanobox is being used to dispute the Myth that FF is fully W3C Compliant." Yup, yet, any comments by the author relating to your misrepresentation of THEIR OWN STATS is disregarded. Hint - Accept they have the right to defend their own stats or find a different source. "2. Try Reading Lynx is NOT a graphical web browser." That however, is not what previous versions of the article stated. As indicated before, you're merely rewording your own statements without changing the facts. "3. More Secure means just that "More" Secure than. It does NOT mean Secure as in "100% Secure". Nothing will be reworded as it already is very clear." No, you see, you didn't say "more secure", on your page you say "Opera is actually the most Secure". A very big difference. So you're contradicting yourself at the very moment.

You have no point with the stats. 1. Nanobot doesn't like his stats being used to show that FF is not fully standards compliant. Oh well it's not. All his ranting in the world is not going to change that FACT. 2. The wording on the article is perfectly clear. 3. Most Secure does not mean 100% Fully secure it just means out of these it has the least amount of vulnerabilities. It is plain English.

You article is still contradictory, replete with errors or untruths & misrepresentation of sources - not to mention the inability to actually understand those that you're actually trying to quote. You're no better in your presentation of facts than Michael Moore or Rush Limbaugh, i.e. self-serving & unable to take accurate criticism. Alas a lot of ignorant people out there will fall for your "debunking".

There is not a single untruth and all the sources are SOURCED. People can read it themselves and make up their own minds. You can't hide the truth, not no more.