Detonator 21.83 vs. 22.50 Benchmarks On WinXP/98SE!

Published by

data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp
LOL on the way out ? heheh ... ok whatever dude, do your research first ...
data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp
Problem is, the GeForce 2 MX 200 is slower than snot. The TNT2 M64 should be just about the same speed. The original MX used 128 bit SDR or 64bit DDR (roughly equal) at 166MHz The MX400 uses 128 bit SDR at 166MHz The TNT2 M64 uses 64 bit SDR at (I think) 150 or 166MHz The MX200 uses 64 bit SDR at 166MHz The Ti200 (200$ GeForce 3) uses 128bit DDR at 200/400 MHz The Ti500 uses 128bit DDR at 250/500 MHz Nvidia cards have always been memory bandwidth bound. The faster your video card's ram runs, the faster the card will be. I'd strongly recommend the 200$ Ti200 or a 300$ Radeon 8500 at this point. You can get either with dualhead support, which is nice, and they both support DirectX 8, which will be important for games released in 2002. And hell, you can get a GF3 Ti500 just about anywhere for 350$ or less, and your games and benchmarks will really fly.
data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp
I had the same problem with 23.11 's with win 98 . It would just keep hesitate every now an then until it froze the computer.