I'd rather see a way to beat Securom 2....

and i'd rather not see anything to do with illegal copying on this site

Hello @papa...i can assure you that talking about cdfreaks has nothing to do with illegal copying. If you visit " cdfreaks" you will see that all threads about that are shutdown emmediately. We only give people the right to backup their own expensive software. Ofcourse this depends on the part of the world you live. That is why the word copying in the header actualy should be replaced with backing up. @ the other poster "try blindwrite/read with bwa builder for securom backup" damian (just a regular visitor of the cdfreaks forums)

Hello @papa...i can assure you that talking about cdfreaks has nothing to do with illegal copying. If you visit " cdfreaks" you will see that all threads about that are shutdown emmediately. We only give people the right to backup their own expensive software. Ofcourse this depends on the part of the world you live. That is why the word copying in the header actualy should be replaced with backing up. @ the other poster "try blindwrite/read with bwa builder for securom backup" damian (just a regular visitor of the cdfreaks forums)

Same idea but with different words about what this dude stated above. :)

i stand corrected, but the reading of the snippet above , suggests to me, that its for illegal copying. maybe in the future CDFreaks will change their policy over wording copying = out backup = in and maybe posters here will copy, or edit it out b4 posting

no..the goal of backing up is different then copying

the word " copying" is already banned for a long time in the forums of cd freaks... backing up for personal use is the goal of all the info contained in the forums