Visual Quality

This is a discussion about Visual Quality in the General Graphics Card Talk category; Toni Beckham at AMD said: AMD has not recalled any AMD Athlon XP processors. We continue to ramp shipments of the world's highest-performance processor for desktop PCs.

This topic was started by , . Last reply by ,


data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp

5 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-08-13
Has Nvidia improved the visual qualitiy in their drivers at all? What are the best drivers for the best visual quality cause I am the type who cares about speed all I'm looking for is quality. Also how are Omega's drivers? Are they any good?

Participate in our website and join the conversation

You already have an account on our website? To log in, use the link provided below.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This subject has been archived. New comments and votes cannot be submitted.

Responses to this topic


data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp

277 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-02-10
I personally hate Omega drivers, they took my frames per sec down to an almost unplayable level and looked far worse than any of the 20.xx/30.xx drivers in ansiotropic mode.

If you really want the best quality I'd suggest using the latest official 30.82 drivers (because of the quality boost these seem to have) and forcing ansiotropic filtering and maybe also applying the GL ansiotropic speed patch. Rivatuner can do the forcing and the speed patch,

http://guru3d.com/rivatuner/

good luck. :)

data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp

277 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-02-10
Poor hardware quality may cause blurryness due to bad RF filtering, but It certainly dosnt cause the level of pixxellation and just plain messed up textures that omega cause.

My cards a Suma Platnium series anyway, which asus and several other companies resell as thier own top of the line model, so don't assume it's hardware. :P