NVIDIA’s Detonator 42.68 and 3Dmark03

I am off to buy one :P

This topic was started by ,


data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp

33 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-10-24
NVIDIA has released the latest drivers, version 42.68 for all 3DMark03 testing and benchmarking. This driver will greatly improve your benchmark performance when running the 3DMark03.

Download NVIDIA´s Detonator 42.68

...and please post your test results: Is the new Detonator a perfomance booster for the 3Dmark03 bench?

greetings

Mister.de

Participate on our website and join the conversation

You have already an account on our website? Use the link below to login.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.

Responses to this topic


data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp

118 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-07-16
42.51: 1685 3D Marks
42.68: 1798 3D Marks

Most noticeable FPS improvment in test 1 - 2 & 3 gained about 6 FPS improvement (test 4 not run).

Have got a thin darkish band that appears in test 3, but not really that noticable.

UPDATE: just uninstalled and went back to 42.51 - 42.68 caused problems with icons and taskbar + BSOD and on reboot NV drivers wouldent load...!

data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp

501 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-11-19
I went from 41.09: 1300
to new ones 1600
non over clocked

over clocked 2000

data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp

501 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-11-19
I also tested them with the old 2001se 3dmark, and i noticed a difference
from stock 9300 to 9900 and o/c's 11,000

data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp

33 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-10-24
OP
first my result:

before: 1663
after: 1781

2100XP+
A7N8X deluxe
2x512 @ 2/2/2
GF4 4600ti

and then, me just got this mail from hwextreme:

"1. Isn't these optimized drivers consider as "cheating" for 3DMark? They sacrifices image quality for the improved performance.

2. Why NVIDIA is releasing optimized drivers that doesn't give any extra performance for any other applications or games, but just for the improved score in 3DMark03?

3. Isn't this the same 'Quake/Quack' issue with ATi a few years back?

4. What is NVIDIA's motive for releasing optimized drivers for the Press?

Can you please help me post a new News in your website at Mister.de and Warp2Search? I need ppl to voice the comments and concern regarding this matter"

-done. .. and greetings

Mister.de

data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp

118 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-07-16
Just run 3D Mark with 42.86 and got 1768..!

data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp

13 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-11-01
Original 42.70 drivers: 1436 3DMarks
New 42.68 drivers: 1569 3DMarks

Athlon XP2400+ @ 2076Mhz
MSI GF4 Ti4200 @ default 250/513
512MB PC2700 DDR RAM

data/avatar/default/avatar02.webp

42 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-12-13
3dmark2001SE:

asus drivers 28.32b = 11320 marks
nvidia 30.82 = 11290 marks
nvidia 40.72 = 11110 marks
asus 31.40f = 11325 marks
nvida 42.68 = 10560 marks (almost every 4x.xx has almost the same result)

Intel Pentium 4 2.4 Ghz 512 cashe
Asus P4PE 533 motherboard
ASUS V8460 deluxe 128DDR
512 ram (266mhz)
Audigy 2
Maxtor 60 Gb 7200 rpm...

data/avatar/default/avatar02.webp

8 Posts
Location -
Joined 2003-02-16
i have gforce3 ti 500 and nvidia is a bullshit change a driver all 5 minute

Pentium4 2.4 Ghz ,asus p4pe/l/r/sata ,gforce3 ti 500 ,2 Hdd in raid 0