FAST 41.80 MIRROR

I've been running the 22.80's for how many weeks now? Please get some newer drivers. Thanks. :).

This topic was started by ,

Participate on our website and join the conversation

You have already an account on our website? Use the link below to login.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.

Responses to this topic


data/avatar/default/avatar03.webp

34 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-12-05
Thanks mate!
Anyone 3DMarked these yet?

data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp

277 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-02-10
I couldn't install the copy off that mirror (CRC Error in the zip) but it might of just been my connection, the one from creative worked.

data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp

58 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-12-22
same here i got the crc error aswell :(

data/avatar/default/avatar03.webp

34 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-12-05
I'm pretty sure that these are a Christmas hoax...
After reading Mister.de's site, it seems it was just a desperate grab for traffic.

Why?

1. Drivers are no longer packed in .zip files, they come in .exe
2. Major hardware/news sites have not acknowledged the release
3. The drivers have a crc error

data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp

33 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-10-24
OP
it was my fault...

being very busy is the matter!

so i didnt tested my downloaded drivers...

but: they ARE FIXED NOW!

again merry x-mas!

:roll:

data/avatar/default/avatar02.webp

34 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-12-14
I just got the drivers but am a little scared to install them after the xmas hoax post. LOL!!!! I don't need a xmas hoax virus...

But ryda, There is still plenty of new Nvidia drivers on the net that come in zips.

data/avatar/default/avatar02.webp

34 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-12-14
So whats the deal with tthese drivers???? Any1 try them yet?

data/avatar/default/avatar02.webp

10 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-03-20
They suppose to be 100% DX9.0 optimized. But I thought 40.xx series already had DX9 implimented?

Because DX9.0 now available to the public does not mean they were already done and nVIDIA/ATI have it already implimented in their previous drivers? I might be wrong.

seems I have a picky system, only 30.82/87 and 40.72 work perfectly for me when involves refreshrates and no/little graphical artifacts.