Detonator 44.67 - eVGA Claims 3DMark Optimisations Corrected
Discuss your findings in this thread please. I wonder how these corrections turn out. . . :hmm:.
This topic was started by Rancho*,Participate on our website and join the conversation
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.
Responses to this topic
i wonder if they did listen to what i said :hmm: , i suggested they should release eVGA based drivers
Cryptic: yeah, you can probably use the drivers
http://www.warp2search.net/article.php?sid...=thread&order=0
click on the article for mirrors to the file
Cryptic: yeah, you can probably use the drivers
http://www.warp2search.net/article.php?sid...=thread&order=0
click on the article for mirrors to the file
tested em on various games and heres my views:
44.65->44.67
= Splinter Cell (not much difference)
+ GTA: Vice City (fps slightly smoother)
= Unreal 2k3 (not much difference)
= WarCraft 3: Frozen Throne (not much difference/of course )
+ Morrowind (fps seems faster, finally can get above 20fps during red sandstorm )
+ Counter-Strike 1.6 (7/7/03) (fps stayed at 98-99, more smooth, overall not much difference)
= (overall no difference/the same)
+ (gives a significant performance boost)
its a keeper for me, though these weren't full gameplay tested (i just went in the game and ran around for a couple of minutes to see fps and smoothness of the levels) :wink:
44.65->44.67
= Splinter Cell (not much difference)
+ GTA: Vice City (fps slightly smoother)
= Unreal 2k3 (not much difference)
= WarCraft 3: Frozen Throne (not much difference/of course )
+ Morrowind (fps seems faster, finally can get above 20fps during red sandstorm )
+ Counter-Strike 1.6 (7/7/03) (fps stayed at 98-99, more smooth, overall not much difference)
= (overall no difference/the same)
+ (gives a significant performance boost)
its a keeper for me, though these weren't full gameplay tested (i just went in the game and ran around for a couple of minutes to see fps and smoothness of the levels) :wink: