Card buying advice
Hi, thought I'd make my first post a question! I'm looking to upgrade my current graphics card (GeForce 3 Ti200) to something a bit more up to date. I've got about £150 (just over $200) to spend and have been reading a lot of reviews vut can't make my mind up.
This topic was started by EdMacFly,
Hi, thought I'd make my first post a question! I'm looking to upgrade my current graphics card (GeForce 3 Ti200) to something a bit more up to date. I've got about £150 (just over $200) to spend and have been reading a lot of reviews vut can't make my mind up. I've had an Nvidia chip for my past three cards and have had no problems but I have been hearing a lot of good things about the ATI chips. Any recommendations would be most helpful, cheers!!
MY BEASTIE
AthlonXP 2400+ (OC'ed to 2600+)
ASUS A7N8x Deluxe
2 x Crucial 512Mb DDR PC3200
ABit GeForce 3 Ti 200 64Mb
Hercules Gamesurround Fortissimo III 7.1
Pioneer DVD
Memorex CD Rewriter
60Gb Seagate HD
40Gb Maxtor HD
Other exciting bits and pieces...
MY BEASTIE
AthlonXP 2400+ (OC'ed to 2600+)
ASUS A7N8x Deluxe
2 x Crucial 512Mb DDR PC3200
ABit GeForce 3 Ti 200 64Mb
Hercules Gamesurround Fortissimo III 7.1
Pioneer DVD
Memorex CD Rewriter
60Gb Seagate HD
40Gb Maxtor HD
Other exciting bits and pieces...
Participate on our website and join the conversation
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.
Responses to this topic
OK. Thanks for the advice. I've been skulking around the net some more and have found a lot of reviews suggesting the radeon 9500 performs better than the 9600. If I could get a 9500 for around the the same price as a 9600 would it be worthwhile? Any ideas on the viability of the 9500 to 9700 mod as well?
Get a 9600pro (read reviews to see which overclock best) and bump up it's clock speed, and it'll beat a stock 9500pro easy. If you check most benchmarks the 9600 only loses by a few points in most benchmarks against a 9500 anyway.
Coyote is right, it's near impossible to find a moddable 9500 new now, maybe if you looked around ebay (careful for fried cards if you go this way) you might find a old 9500 for sale that uses the 9700 PCB.
IMO the 9600pro is the best money/price at the moment overclocked or not.
Coyote is right, it's near impossible to find a moddable 9500 new now, maybe if you looked around ebay (careful for fried cards if you go this way) you might find a old 9500 for sale that uses the 9700 PCB.
IMO the 9600pro is the best money/price at the moment overclocked or not.
You won't likely see any gains (and probably drops) with a Geforce FX5200 in DX8 titles. If you can stand to wait for even 1 DX9 game to come out, you'll probably save a bundle on a DX9 GPU. I say it's NOT the time to buy. For current performance measurements, see Tom's video buyer's guide 2003
If you really can't wait i will suggest the Radeon 9600. cause this is really a good card and is the first 0.13 micron CPU in the world. I am using it too. but if you can wait, i will probably say wait for the 9900 cause i heard someone say it is bunble with hlaf-life 2 :hmm: . Save your money meantime.
Well me thinks i find an error on that 'First .13 Micron" statement... I would say It's SiS' Xabre600, a DirectX 8.1-compliant GPU. dont get me wrong..the card cant hold a candle to todays gpu/vpu but i think it rightly holds the title as "First". SiS might seem like an unlikely candidate to have the first 0.13-micron desktop GPU, but they were also the first to support AGP 8X with the Xabre's initial launch, so they're no stranger to pushing the envelope. Unfortunately, the Xabre's initial launch was plagued by poor performance, application incompatibilities, and questionable driver shenanigans that largely overshadowed SiS' unique graphics offering.
That SiS was able to move the Xabre600 to a 0.13-micron process before graphics heavyweights like NVIDIA and ATI is impressive, but don't expect this chip to take on high-end offerings like the GeForce FX. The Xabre600 is positioned against more mid-range offerings like the Radeon 9000 Pro, which is why you won't find it running at 500MHz with a Dustbuster strapped on its back. :o
That SiS was able to move the Xabre600 to a 0.13-micron process before graphics heavyweights like NVIDIA and ATI is impressive, but don't expect this chip to take on high-end offerings like the GeForce FX. The Xabre600 is positioned against more mid-range offerings like the Radeon 9000 Pro, which is why you won't find it running at 500MHz with a Dustbuster strapped on its back. :o