El_Coyote

499 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-12-18

#21510

2003-09-16 12:45

while other games do. take a look at the jedi knight games, and *gasp* aquanox, and they are used as benchmarks anyways. and they can, because when you read reviews, they benchmark with identical systems, besides the graphics they are testing, so the esult is comparable after-all. aquamark benches your whole system.

4 times since 1ghz? well that would make small intervals, and the difference wouldnt be very clear. and in the mean time games has gotten heavyer on the cou aswell... try putting your 1ghz back in and play some bf1942 or jedi.

0 0

El_Coyote

499 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-12-18

#21511

2003-09-16 13:07

and..


If you do a test between a 2Ghz/Radeon 9800 Pro VS a 3,2Ghz/GeForce 4, which would you think will score the highest score in aquamark???
this IS directx 9, remember?

0 0

JemyM

108 Posts
Location -
Joined 2003-02-13

#21512

2003-09-16 13:40

while other games do. take a look at the jedi knight games, and *gasp* aquanox, and they are used as benchmarks anyways. and they can, because when you read reviews, they benchmark with identical systems, besides the graphics they are testing, so the esult is comparable after-all. aquamark benches your whole system.
4 times since 1ghz? well that would make small intervals, and the difference wouldnt be very clear. and in the mean time games has gotten heavyer on the cou aswell... try putting your 1ghz back in and play some bf1942 or jedi.

Me and my friend have both 2400+/512mb. I have fx5900u, he have GF3Ti500.
While I could play Jedi Academy in 1600x1200 top-quality-everything, he could barely run the game in 800x600... He claimed it felt 'nostalgic' since it looked like the first Jedi Knight games at that resolution

But very well. Perhaps a 1,4ghz difference would actually 'feel' different in a modern game... But it would be a 10-20% tradeoff at max...

Best Regards
JemyM

0 0

El_Coyote

499 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-12-18

#21513

2003-09-16 13:52

ok i had my 20.099

now looking in the ARC result thingy, i see a guy with the samce cpu as i (2000+) but with a 9700pro (i have a slightly oc'ed 9500np - currently without the softmod), and his results is 30.171
so i wouldnt excactly say your therory is valid, since he got 50% more than me.

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=230819338

0 0

JemyM

108 Posts
Location -
Joined 2003-02-13

#21514

2003-09-16 15:44

There is something fishy going on here. There is a guy with almost the exact same hardware as me that posted here that got 10k more than me... The only real difference is that he have 100mhz more CPU than me...

0 0

El_Coyote

499 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-12-18

#21515

2003-09-16 16:55

or your windows could be dragging ressources from the game and pour them in the big pool of oblivion

0 0

Chernobyl

55 Posts
Location -
Joined 2003-05-03

#21516

2003-09-17 00:47

get all the info u want on Aquamark 03

http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=getarticle&articID=101

:)

0 0

FillyO

3 Posts
Location -
Joined 2003-09-17

#21517

2003-09-17 01:34

I ran 38,000 something

2500+ Barton o/c 2.3
A7N8X
Corsair XMS PC3200LL
Radeon 9700 Pro

0 0

FillyO

3 Posts
Location -
Joined 2003-09-17

#21518

2003-09-17 01:44

I ran it again o/c my 9700 Pro to 364/344 and improved!!

41,598

0 0

Sparkesy

162 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-12-16

#21519

2003-09-17 12:32

my cpu is hlding this back alot.

I just managed to get 35000 with 45.24 Dets

0 0

Reign_Of_Chaos

9 Posts
Location -
Joined 2003-11-03

#21520

2003-11-04 05:45

AquaMark Score: 50530 (CPU: 10117, GFX: 6735)


http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=1770748610

0 0

dredlock

116 Posts
Location -
Joined 2004-04-09

#21521

2004-04-17 11:35

im only getting 32,700 is that bad for my setup?

0 0

Anonymous

0 Posts
Location -
Joined -

#21522

2004-04-17 11:56

nope it your card ...
in Aquamark 3 the GPU makes the most difference

0 0

zerodamage

36 Posts
Location -
Joined 2004-05-03

#21523

2004-05-05 15:50

.GeForce FX 5950 U 256 ed (GainWard GS)
.AXP3200+ (400fsb)
.1gb XMS mem (pc3200)
.A7N8X - Deluxe (rev. 2.01)

FW : 61.11
:::::::::::Nothing oced:::::::::::

My score : 45645

0 0

Anonymous

0 Posts
Location -
Joined -

#21524

2004-05-05 17:25

absolutely normal ... I just get pretty much the same and with a Ti4200 you get ~ 30k

0 0

Dark Biene

1352 Posts
Location -
Joined 2004-02-01

#21525

2004-05-05 18:08

huh....i managed 37000 points.....

nothing Overclocked at this time

0 0

sT121KER

154 Posts
Location -
Joined 2003-06-09

#21526

2004-05-24 13:28

My computer gets 43, 154 in Aquamark 3 with ATi Radeon 9800 pro.

0 0

dimvlaan

202 Posts
Location -
Joined 2003-10-05

#21527

2004-05-26 12:44

33,334 - with Det. 56.72...

0 0

Dark Biene

1352 Posts
Location -
Joined 2004-02-01

#21528

2006-01-08 18:08

GFX: 10362
CPU: 9487

AquaMarks: 67024



AMD x2 3800+
Geforce 6800GT

@Stock Speed

General:
Name: Benchmark 2006-01-08 19-05-25
Processor:
Vendor: AuthenticAMD
Name: AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+
SpeedMHz: 2009
Type: 0
Family: 15
Model: 3
Stepping: 2
Flags: 0xE3D3FBFF
Number: 2
HyperThreading: n/a
MemoryOS: 1073180672
Graphics:
Description: NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Series GPU
Vendor: 4318
Device: 249
SubSys: 2174226499
Revision: 162
CoreClock: 6
MemoryClock: 0
Driver: nv4_disp.dll
DriverVersion: 6.14.10.8310
VideoMemory: 263192576
TextureMemory: 513802240
OperatingSystem:
Version: Microsoft Windows XP
Type:
Build: Service Pack 2 2600
Run0:
DisplayWidth: 1024
DisplayHeight: 768
DisplayDepth: 32
AntialiasingMode: 0
AntialiasingQuality: 0
AnisotropicFiltering: 4
DetailLevel: 4
AvgFPS: 67.024506
MinFPS: 25.000000
MaxFPS: 142.000000
AvgFPSRender: 103.632225
AvgFPSSimulation: 189.737213
AvgTrianglesPerSecond: 20176532
MinTrianglesPerSecond: 3130730
MaxTrianglesPerSecond: 39390619
AquamarkScoreRender: 10362
AquamarkScoreSimulation: 9487
AquamarkScore: 67024

0 0