3dmark2k1 results, low/normal/high?
7666 with 3dmark2k1 http://service. madonion. com/compare?2k1=3638908 for some reason I'm thinking it should be higher but I dunno, hard to compare in the database with all those super o/ced systems in there is it low/normal/high? Xeib.
This topic was started by Xeib,
7666 with 3dmark2k1
http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=3638908
for some reason I'm thinking it should be higher but I dunno, hard to compare in the database with all those super o/ced systems in there
is it low/normal/high?
Xeib
http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=3638908
for some reason I'm thinking it should be higher but I dunno, hard to compare in the database with all those super o/ced systems in there
is it low/normal/high?
Xeib
Participate on our website and join the conversation
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.
Responses to this topic
W2k/XP gets slightly more because of it's faster memory/fill rate, even if the real fps are the same.
As long as games run fine it dosn't really matter, some weirdo on 3dmark's listing will always have a OC'd liquid nitrogen cooled setup scoring 5 times the points on a same system so it's pretty much useless to work out real world scores on 3dmark. Especially since it dosnt even count harddisk, sound or network. Not like the Max Payne engine is popular with game makers either.
As long as games run fine it dosn't really matter, some weirdo on 3dmark's listing will always have a OC'd liquid nitrogen cooled setup scoring 5 times the points on a same system so it's pretty much useless to work out real world scores on 3dmark. Especially since it dosnt even count harddisk, sound or network. Not like the Max Payne engine is popular with game makers either.
