3DMARK 2001 SE 19k CLUB

woohoo! YEAH Alright!

This topic was started by ,


data/avatar/default/avatar03.webp

5 Posts
Location -
Joined 2003-05-05
19215

Scored this with on a Epox 8RDA+ motherboard with 512MB Corsair XMS3500C2 memory and ATI 9700pro. All Air cooled. 8)

Participate on our website and join the conversation

You have already an account on our website? Use the link below to login.
Login
Create a new user account. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds.
Register
This topic is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast.

Responses to this topic


data/avatar/default/avatar02.webp

8 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-10-20
Ive got the same motherboard and 512 Twinmos 3700 Memory with a Barton 2500 clocked at 2300mhz (11.5x200), using also a ATI 9700 Pro (Not clocked), but i can only get 15843.

Can you recommend any more settings, that might help me up my score.

SHINODA :evil:

data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp

55 Posts
Location -
Joined 2003-05-03
You might try
a) overclocking your graphics card (large performance gains).
clocking the memory some more and dropping the multiplier to compensate
c) it would be good to find what driver CiKoTiC used and what settings he changed. He could have set the graphics driver up for max performance with lowest image quality. I would suspect so seeing as this is about getting the maximum score.
d) make sure your motherboard drivers/BIOS are up to date

good luck

data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp

115 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-01-20
I have a really similar spec machine (see sig). I only clock the hardware and set image quality to max (without anti-aliasing or AF). 8) If you take a look at omega driver's site, he has really underwhelming clocks on his hardware but he must have really, really tweaked the drivers.

http://www.omegacorner.com/about.htm

data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp

115 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-01-20
looks like that Barton helps a little in some tests

We don't know the core/mem clock for the 9700pro - this is more likely going to effect the result. Thats the good thing about 3dmark03 you can't hide your gfx clock.

Without knowing the gfx clock we can't say that the barton made all the improvements. I hope not since I just got a xp1800+ DLT3C JUIHB which clocks to at least 2500Mhz. Have it at 2400Mhz 24/7. More testing needed to find sweet spot voltage @ 2500Mhz with daytime temps.

data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp

115 Posts
Location -
Joined 2002-01-20
Environment Bump Mapping
(FPS)

Mine 162.8

Spajdr 155.5

Looks like this test has got worse for nforce 2. Is it used alot, apart from this benchmark?

data/avatar/default/avatar03.webp

9 Posts
Location -
Joined 2003-03-22
Environment Bump Mapping
(FPS)

Mine 162.8

Spajdr 155.5

Looks like this test has got worse for nforce 2. Is it used alot, apart from this benchmark?


Well .. not much .. but Bloodrayne uses it,actually sometimes its 250 then 155 fps,something is wrong in 3D Mark 2001SE since AGP Sidebanding i have enabled all the time.)¨

megatron : well i run XP 1700+ at 12.5x200Mhz .. anything higher is unstable,more voltage didnt help (watercooled)

Another test .. code creatures